Black Forest Labs has been making waves since launching the FLUX.1 image generation model, and their latest release, FLUX.1 Kontext, has quickly become the talk of social media platforms like YouTube and TikTok. Its impressive features and speed are everywhere in test videos and creator reviews. As one of the best AI Tools Directories, AIPURE couldn’t resist putting FLUX.1 Kontext through its paces—and you can check out our full review video and article here:
📑 FLUX.1 Kontext Review 2025: The Ultimate AI Image Editing Tool That Rivals Photoshop (https://aipure.ai/articles/flux1-kontext-ai-image-editing-review-2025)
🎬 FLUX.1 Kontext Review – A Game-Changer for AI Image Editing?
With so many powerful AI image generators available in 2025, it can be hard to know which one to choose. To help you decide, AIPURE has done a head-to-head comparison of FLUX.1 Kontext with other top contenders: Midjourney V7, GPT-4o Image, and Ideogram 3.0. Here’s how they stack up across multiple categories, with real test prompts and results.
Test 1: Character Consistency Across Scenes
💡Prompt: "A young woman with curly red hair, wearing a blue jacket, standing in a city park. Show her in the same outfit at a cafe, in a library, and at a concert."
FLUX.1 Kontext: The characters in all scenes are almost perfectly consistent. Facial features, hairstyles, and clothing remain highly recognizable throughout.
（This image was generated by AIPURE using FLUX.1 Kontext）
Midjourney V7: Character consistency is basically maintained, but there are no consistent characters in the concert scene at the end.
（This image was generated by AIPURE using Midjourney V7）
GPT-4o Image: Character consistency is good overall, but some minor differences in facial details can still be observed.
（This image was generated by AIPURE using GPT-4o Image）
Ideogram 3.0: It is impossible to maintain a consistent character appearance. The character style varies, sometimes appearing as a cartoon and other times as a realistic figure.
（This image was generated by AIPURE using Ideogram 3.0）
Test 2: Precise Local Edits
💡Prompt 2-1:"A photo of a cat sitting on a windowsill.”
💡Prompt 2-2:“Change the cat’s collar to be red with a gold bell, and add a vase of sunflowers on the windowsill."
FLUX.1 Kontext: The cat collar and bell were added correctly, and the vase was added exactly as required. However, the image was not completely consistent—while the original cat was looking outward, the modified cat’s head was offset and tilted inward.
（This image was generated by AIPURE using FLUX.1 Kontext）
Midjourney V7: The local modification function is temporarily unavailable.
GPT-4o Image: The cat collar, bell, and vase were added correctly, but unnecessary color tones were introduced, resulting in inconsistency with the original image.
（This image was generated by AIPURE using GPT-4o Image）
Ideogram 3.0: The local modification function is temporarily unavailable.
Test 3: Style Transfer
💡Prompt:"Generate a scene of a dog running through a field in the style of Van Gogh’s Starry Night."
FLUX.1 Kontext: Perfectly captures Van Gogh’s style, with vivid brushstrokes and colors.
（This image was generated by AIPURE using FLUX.1 Kontext）
Midjourney V7: Excellent style transfer, better than FLUX.1.
（This image was generated by AIPURE using Midjourney V7）
GPT-4o Image: Good style transfer, but not vivid enough.
（This image was generated by AIPURE using GPT-4o Image）
Ideogram 3.0: Does not capture Van Gogh’s style very well.
（This image was generated by AIPURE using Ideogram 3.0）
Test 4: Speed and Efficiency
FLUX.1 Kontext: 3–5 seconds per image (fastest)
GPT-4o Image: 20–25 seconds per image
Midjourney V7: 15–20 seconds per image
Ideogram 3.0: 10–15 seconds per image
FLUX.1 Kontext vs Midjourney V7 vs GPT-4o Image vs Ideogram 3.0: Comparison Summary Table
| Feature | FLUX.1 Kontext | Midjourney V7 | GPT-4o Image | Ideogram 3.0 |
| Character Consistency | ✅⭐ | ✅ | ⚪ | ❌ |
| Precise Local Edits | ✅⭐ | ✅ | ⚪ | ⚪ |
| Style Transfer | ✅⭐ | ✅ | ⚪ | ⚪ |
| Speed | ✅⭐ | ⚪ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Ease of Use | ✅⭐ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
✅⭐ = Excellent | ✅ = Good | ⚪ = Average | ❌ = Below Average
Which AI Image Generator best for you?
FLUX.1 Kontext:
- Best for: Content creators, designers, and marketers who need fast, precise, and consistent image generation and editing.
- Why: Unmatched speed, character consistency, and editing precision make it ideal for professional workflows.
Midjourney V7:
- Best for: Artists and hobbyists who want high-quality, stylized images and don’t mind a bit of wait.
- Why: Still one of the best for artistic style and creativity.
GPT-4o Image:
- Best for: Casual users and those who want quick, general-purpose image generation.
- Why: Easy to use, but not as precise or fast as the others.
Ideogram 3.0:
- Best for: Users who want a balance of speed, style, and editing capabilities.
- Why: Not the best in any single category.
If you want the fastest, most precise, and most consistent AI image generator in 2025, FLUX.1 Kontext is the clear winner. For artistic flair, Midjourney V7 remains a strong choice, while GPT-4o Image and Ideogram 3.0 are solid options for more casual or general use. Whatever your needs, AIPURE has you covered with the latest reviews and comparisons!
